garry’s posthaven

Was reading my old blog archives from xanga and found this old rap video from 2006 of the Mongolian hip hop rappers Tatar. Really chilled out tracks, if you can get over listening to someone rap in a language you have no understanding of whatsoever.

Turns out they got a myspace page, which led me to even more of their work...

Last login to MySpace in 2008. Wonder what these guys are up to now. Wonder who does their beats? I like em. Hip hop is everywhere. The best b-boys in the world are in France and South Korea. There is Mongolian rap. One global youth culture, via Adidas and Dr. Dre.

For more Asian hip hop, see my post about Chinese rappers Yin Tsang (隐藏) and their track Zai Beijing...

Science is a repeatable act. Art is usually a destination with many paths. In that respect, startups are more like art than science.

Entrepreneurs try to learn from prior mistakes (theirs and those of their prior employers) and try to double down on what they know to work. When entrepreneurs go over to the other side of the table, they do the same. Avoid negative things and pursue that which returns profit.

Most investors therefore end up pattern matching. They pattern match against ideas (thus preferring consumer over enterprise, early stage over growth stage, and vice versa/so on) and teams (top CS schools, past success) and relationships (warm intros from entrepreneurs who have made them money).

So when I hear about people getting angry or crestfallen about being rejected from YC, or being turned down by VC's or angels, I want to grab them by the shoulders and shake them vigorously. Because investors make bets on what they've seen, and everyone has limited experience. So the most direct reaction is to be offended in some way, and to take it as a signal that your idea sucks, or maybe your team is terrible. While those might be true, the larger factor is usually that you don't match their pattern recognizer.

So change to fit the pattern, or find other ways to make it work. Because lightning does strike the same place, but never takes exact same path to get there.

This morning I read a 2005 article in Fortune on How Netscape Lost Its Way. Jim Clark, Netscape cofounder, reflected at the time:

We were all consumed by Microsoft. Jim Barksdale aged ten years in three. Marc Andreessen is not one to hold his tongue. It’s part of his charm, I guess. He did thumb his nose at Microsoft pretty much continuously. And I did too. I would give speeches, and when I would pound Microsoft a little bit I would always get a rise from the audience. If we had kept the visibility lower and said nothing about Microsoft, it probably would have given us another year. Ram Shriram, who was at Netscape and later at Microsoft, has since told me that Bill Gates and everyone there said we were like the matador waving the red flag. The more we waved, the more it helped him unify the troops to kill us.

So it was a bad thing to do in retrospect. But once it got started, we almost couldn’t stop, because the press would egg you on and Marc was the David to the big Goliath. He liked that role. But it was actually misplaced—there was no way the browser was going to replace the operating system.

So a couple lessons. The first is relatively obvious -- pick your battles with those you have a fair chance at defeating, at least initially. Later in the same article, employees mention that multiple tactical mistakes happen because Microsoft turns into a foe too early. Having an enemy can focus you in intense ways, but might focus you on the wrong things. It's a double edged sword.

Lately, in the course of advising and talking to super early stage web startups, I've also often seen the reverse. Many founders starting out worry too much about ___ startup they saw in Techcrunch. Those guys aren't your competitors. Your competitor is the back button. And it is a far more lethal competitor than those bullet point item companies you threw in your Competitors slide.

On the other hand, isn't it funny how in 2005 it was still OK to say that there was no way the browser was going to replace the operating system? That strikes me in 2010 as plainly untrue. If anything, the browser will kill Microsoft eventually. It just won't be Netscape doing the killing.

Was honored to be included in an interview series by the creator of search engine, Duck Duck Go, Gabriel Weinberg, which just got posted today. Check it out below, or click through to Gabriel's blog.

If you liked this, check out more videos over at Traction Book, or follow Gabriel at twitter and posterous.

PS, my hair is not usually this long. Andrew Lee, cofounder at epic and awesome music game Jamlegend and I are growing our hair out for Locks of Love. It's for the kids with no hair, ya know.

Hat Tip my friend Dustin Chang - Facebook Profile favorite quotations

Virtual Private Network software is notoriously bad and difficult to configure. Years ago I heard about a solution that got me actually excited about the space. It was called Hamachi, and it was a simple, Napster-like desktop client that let you share files and actual network connectivity even behind firewalls. It was magic.

This is what Hamachi's homepage looked like in 2006, when I last saw it:

By April 2006, it had garnered over 2 million unique users. That is EXPLOSIVE growth. It was a simple homepage for a simple, free, and awesome networking tool that everyone loved. I was looking forward to seeing how this software would change the world. There was a groundswell of support for this service, and people used it for everything from file sharing to LAN games. You could have an office LAN without being in an office. (Think: Damn where are my files, can I remote desktop back in? Doh, IT guy didn't set it up. Or won't let me. Or is incompetent. Hamachi made this problem go away because it democratized networks to the personal level instead of the physical IT level.)

Today, if you wanted to do what Hamachi did for free in 2006 (and for $200/year now) -- it would take hours of configuration using OpenVPN. Here are the instructions. I tried it. It works, but you'd have to be insane to think more than .001% of the very big geeks on the entire planet would be willing/able to set that process up.

The Hamachi scenario seems to me incredibly valuable. Recently I wanted to be able to create a simple VPN for my two Macbook Pros, and went back to do some research.

Turns out that in August 2006, just later that year, Hamachi was bought by LogMeIn.com for an undisclosed sum. Pretty amazing work for what I've heard was a single founder who built it all himself.  That's the great and beautiful news. Someone created something people wanted, and is now hopefully set for life. And rightly so.

The bad news: Hamachi's homepage now looks like this:

That's brutal. The MBA's got to it, and now look what happened. Hamachi had the potential to change the world through peer-to-peer networking. It made sharing across firewalls totally safe. It solved a need that in a connected world, everyone has.

But there's nothing interesting about the new positioning of Hamachi. Its geared towards IT managers looking for big iron purchases. The PC World crowd -- the evaluators and the tire kickers. Don't get me wrong, they're going to make money with this strategy, and plenty of it. But it won't nearly approach the potential of what you see today with, say... Dropbox. Dropbox, Napster, and Hamachi are phenomenal examples of difficult technology made incredibly easy -- thus creating something so easy and useful that a revolution was made.

A hundred million people won't use Hamachi anymore. It is but one product in a suite of many, a destroyed brand and a mostly squandered opportunity. But a hundred million people may use your version of it... because it doesn't exist yet. That is the beauty of it -- when someone stumbles and falls, no matter how large, that is your opportunity.

Go forth and build.