I recently had a problem with Kodak Gallery. I made the mistake of using them for some photos about six or seven years ago, when I didn't know any better. Someone at Kodak has decided to make a buck off of this mistake, and the mistake of hundreds of thousands of other poor souls who also became Kodak Gallery users. They said they would delete our photos
if we didn't buy a bunch of stuff.
I spent a couple hours writing a simple ruby script that let people download their full Kodak galleries
without resorting to paying exorbitant fees to get an Archive CD. Or in the case of one user, NINETY archive CD's.
Here's the comment I received earlier from a Kodak Gallery user named Deepak Jain this evening that blew me away:
I've been using Kodakgallery since 2003 (when there weren't many options and I figured Kodak was a good enough name to stay around). I didn't even mind buying stuff form them until photographs became passe.
I even tried to buy their Archive CD except their system can't process > 40,000 images via Archive CD.
They keep canceling my order without comment. [ed: emphasis mine]
(Current photo storage: 62.532 GB Used,
Your Archive CD Pricing:
Number of Photos: 42666
Cost of your CD: $667.85 FYI).
Works like a champ. Send me an address and I'll send you some beer or money or something.
It's one thing to charge, and it's another thing to charge a user $700. But to not even be able to process that order is incompetent
. To be honest, I made the same mistake. I thought Kodak was a good enough brand. Evidently good enough to eat 70 gigabytes of cherished photos and require an open source ruby script to extricate it.
Deepak, I'm glad the script ended up being useful for you. User generated content sites of any kind should heed this rule: Let users download their data. Making a buck is fine, and in fact necessary. But when you're dealing with people's memories, do not hold them hostage.